Renowned gaming journalist Jason Schreier has voiced his disappointment with the highly anticipated game, Crimson Desert.
Following the release of initial reviews and player feedback for Crimson Desert, Schreier shared his personal take on social media after playing for just a few hours. He stated:
“So boring and soulless that I absolutely did not want to play it anymore. Looks like a game made for people who just want to consume content.”
His strong criticism quickly gained traction within the gaming community, prompting a wave of reactions from players. Many were quick to point out Schreier’s previous positive reception of titles such as Avowed and Dragon Age: The Veilguard, drawing comparisons to his current stance on Crimson Desert.
“A clear example that he is not a gamer, but just an activist.”
“The fact that this clown hates [Crimson Desert] is a clear sign that it’s a great game. Don’t forget, he praised Dragon Age: Veilguard and Avowed. Essentially, everything he says probably means the exact opposite.”
These responses highlight a debate among gamers regarding critical objectivity and the perceived biases of certain journalists, especially when past preferences seem to clash with current critiques.